Skip to main content

Forward

Global health planning for ongoing and future pandemics will require continued evaluation of condensed data aggregation. We want to be selective and smart about what we badger about.

The current indicators tell a global story, and one of the main narratives is that of the data not available.

50% of countries do not have data on whether or not they have infection prevention in long term care, 67% of countries have no data on whether or not they have occupational health for workers, 45% of countries have no data on whether or not they have national IPC programs and WASH standards, and so forth. There's a lot that we have no data on, a lot that individual countries have no data about themselves on. Let's improve. 

Let's badger about obtaining the basics of the listed indicators, funding to obtain and be accountable to these indicators, and alignment of details of the indicators. 

As a global group:

We should shoulder burden. Countries with indicator ease should shoulder some burden in training and lending a hand. Governments should strive to prevent nationalistic small scope, and thus pandemic management failure.  Not only does indicator partnership address improvement needs, these partnerships assist in that prevention. And, these partnerships are the right thing to do.

We should strive for accountability. WHO and intermediaries should assure accountability with resource and funds. Training and assistance can be easily mismanaged without stakeholder buy in.  

We should communicate. Communication and facilitation of partnership connections could be a component to openWHO, where training is already familiar. We know openWHO training is a great platform, as millions have been trained for COVID through it.

We should set timelines. Asking for indicator data is a first step. There should be follow up points and deadlines set for resolution of data aggregation. 

We should include economic and social planning as an indicator. This would connect involvement already at various tables (economics, food security) and this could establish stronger structure for future pandemics. 

Let's badger forward. 


https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-operational-update-on-covid-19---13-november-2020

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Refugees, migrants and forcibly displaced persons

Continued pandemic management requires improved operations for forcibly displaced persons, migrants and refugees. Better organization for this population will expedite prevention and treatment for people, assist host countries and help prepare for future outbreaks. Organization for refugees, migrants and forcibly displaced persons should include:  * International oversight      R ecommendations and monetary awards for countries managing these populations should be supported with global analyses and follow up   .    Cohesive action should be driven by formal global planning, with experts at the table.    Real time analysis of host country needs and resources for the refugee and forcibly displaced population. If we are aware of the basics, we can improve real time analytics.  * Accountability    World Health Organization situational reports shape questions of accountability to epidemiological and surveillance improvements. E...

Beyond the Board

Sometimes it takes more than a board of directors to ensure an agency or government is safeguarding our interests. This is particularly true in regulation.  While a country's best interests may not align with international agenda, regulation on behalf of safety and protection is almost always universal. Workarounds to regulation, often allowed of out of self interest or cost, should be tied to international repercussions.  Regulation of food, markets, environmental epidemiology and other early prevention in novel strains make a difference.  Upcoming pandemics and outbreaks can be avoided, or at least better addressed, with better regulation. The international community should gather several policy points, measures and international comparisons. The international health community should observe, encourage and report on countries with and without these policies.  The end of the year COVID-19 WHO report is dynamic and impressive. It is missing policy development and in...

Party Bus

R egulatory approval across borders remain suboptimal. The suboptimal description is subjective, and our world has no way to measure optimal international regulatory efficiency. For all the work we have placed in international alignment, in every industry, we have yet to formalize evaluation measures on how we're doing.  International regulatory alignment is a fun party bus, yet many countries are reluctant to join. If we really trust one another, and our collegial backstory, we know we can join safely. Bus rides can perform stops, breaks when necessary, and rejoining when ready, but they can't wait forever for one to initially hop on. We don't have the option to join at any time, yet after we join, every option is available to us. A country that gets on the party bus remains in control alongside one another. This is especially important as we work toward better medicine for loved ones, for those seeing stars, and for everyone in the world.   Evaluate international r...