Skip to main content

Crossroads of supply

In preparation for future outbreaks, supply management in pandemic operations should be examined and evaluated now.

WHO has done exceptional work in communication, streamlining supply request operations and providing available, up to date information around supply. 

IDSA and infectious disease communities have provided exceptional expertise in rapid response. This includes ongoing analyses around lab comparison and testing strategies. 

Labor, government, diplomacy and other individual country contributions have provided immediate, attentive compassion. Notably, work around laboratory supply test explanation to the public and direct ask to every laboratory test for data aggregation is critical. 

All of this effort should be supported with immediate improvement teams in the global arena. Opportunities for improvement global health pandemic management supply could emphasize:  

    ⦾ Evaluation of ongoing demands, shortage and turn around time to delivery.

    ⦾ Evaluation of supply liaison work: how was baseline supply assessed, how does baseline compare with current requests and country use, and how do these metrics compare with reported COVID test results, hospitalizations, antiviral use, antibiotic use, empty beds and mortality from the country?

    ⦾ Evaluation of laboratory testing communication issued by WHO: to date, there is no easy to read document on sensitivity, specificity, and quality of labs by product, brand, type and country use. This is important when pulling the pandemic away from geopolitics, and the tug of war will always be a constant. Laboratory comparisons in an easy-to-read, public friendly document should be available.  

    ⦾ Notation of contribution to the global health supply work by individual countries, including the FDA and in EU structures. This work directly supports, even as an indirect non-monetary offer. Acknowledging indirect support by building off of it, in collaboration, could strengthen global pandemic solidarity. Success at the crossroads is realized when roadblocks are removed and interstate traffic improvements are adopted. 


As global health is funded with collective donations, country taxes, etc, all of these improvement points should be accessible in public reports. WHO has done phenomenal work around supply; having an improvement team secures long-term credibility to global health effort. 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Refugees, migrants and forcibly displaced persons

Continued pandemic management requires improved operations for forcibly displaced persons, migrants and refugees. Better organization for this population will expedite prevention and treatment for people, assist host countries and help prepare for future outbreaks. Organization for refugees, migrants and forcibly displaced persons should include:  * International oversight      R ecommendations and monetary awards for countries managing these populations should be supported with global analyses and follow up   .    Cohesive action should be driven by formal global planning, with experts at the table.    Real time analysis of host country needs and resources for the refugee and forcibly displaced population. If we are aware of the basics, we can improve real time analytics.  * Accountability    World Health Organization situational reports shape questions of accountability to epidemiological and surveillance improvements. E...
Post a Comment
Read more

Beyond the Board

Sometimes it takes more than a board of directors to ensure an agency or government is safeguarding our interests. This is particularly true in regulation.  While a country's best interests may not align with international agenda, regulation on behalf of safety and protection is almost always universal. Workarounds to regulation, often allowed of out of self interest or cost, should be tied to international repercussions.  Regulation of food, markets, environmental epidemiology and other early prevention in novel strains make a difference.  Upcoming pandemics and outbreaks can be avoided, or at least better addressed, with better regulation. The international community should gather several policy points, measures and international comparisons. The international health community should observe, encourage and report on countries with and without these policies.  The end of the year COVID-19 WHO report is dynamic and impressive. It is missing policy development and in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Party Bus

R egulatory approval across borders remain suboptimal. The suboptimal description is subjective, and our world has no way to measure optimal international regulatory efficiency. For all the work we have placed in international alignment, in every industry, we have yet to formalize evaluation measures on how we're doing.  International regulatory alignment is a fun party bus, yet many countries are reluctant to join. If we really trust one another, and our collegial backstory, we know we can join safely. Bus rides can perform stops, breaks when necessary, and rejoining when ready, but they can't wait forever for one to initially hop on. We don't have the option to join at any time, yet after we join, every option is available to us. A country that gets on the party bus remains in control alongside one another. This is especially important as we work toward better medicine for loved ones, for those seeing stars, and for everyone in the world.   Evaluate international r...
Post a Comment
Read more