It is respectful to work with experts on their recommendations, sure. It's also wise, though, and it strengthens mutual confidence.
Just by refining unity, we can hold mutual confidence with global health leadership.
Global health experts are asking countries to take note of technology, digital population management tools and other broad, creative strategies. We should listen, dialogue and host public forums for international representatives to agree and align. We should respect the due north of technology wins. This respect will secure a solid footing for upcoming pandemics as well. Read more here.
Global health experts are asking countries to acknowledge and address surges and surge risks in the coming weeks and months. COVID is not going to go away. Countries are not doing enough to reach out and listen to WHO experts on reduction work. We should reach out internationally and ask our governments to model dialogue. Read more here.
Global health experts are asking countries to believe their epidemiology. If the majority have not been exposed to COVID, we have an even greater responsibility to manage, prevent and fund. Their asks in funding have gone unanswered, even though the asks are an economic investment. These asks should be funded, now. An investment for the present pandemic is an investment for future pandemics. Read more here.
Global health experts repeatedly tie infectious disease with climate and other regulation. When we ask them to list short and long term recommendations, we need to follow through on listening. This needs to start now, out of mutual respect. It is much wiser to respond to an impending storm right at the first sign of a breeze. We are well beyond the first signs.
Members of the public are not the only ones under fatigue. When expertise goes ignored, we have sent the wrong message to the experts. We would be wise to attend the due north of global health expertise with interstellar mutual respect, now.
Comments
Post a Comment